TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Screen Captures with Stamps and Shadows From:Jim Barrow <vrfour -at- verizon -dot- net> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:23:24 -0500 (CDT)
>Roger Bell wrote:
>Has anyone given much thought, completed any research, conducted
>usability tests, or adopted a standard regarding applying stamps, >such as a tear effect, and shadows to screen captures in technical
>documentation?
Yes. I used the tear effect on my current project and the users/QA/Test all said that it confused them; made it seem like the software application had "broken".
I did, however, use the Fade effect and that got good responses. I used this effect when I had 2-3 of the same screen in quick order, typically to show a dropdown menu, etc. What I did was zoom into the quarter of the screen that contained the field, then I faded the inside borders of the screen shot (imagine a rectangle with the top and left sides faded.
>My company is considering using a tear effect and shadow in the PDF
>documentation for a new software product. After creating some >examples and passing them around for input, one person in our >company commented that the tear effect suggested anger or >frustration to him and that it may have the same effect on our >customers. I had never considered that reaction.
You could always use the tear effect and also include a hot spot that displays a pictine of Sigmund Freud:^)
>In looking at most software documentation, it appears that >rectangles and squares without shadows or stamps are most commonly >used. As a user, would it make a difference to you? Since stamps >and shadows add no useful information to the user, we were going >for the "way cool" effect.
FYI: I used the previous tech writer's work as a template/guide, only on my documetation I included shadows and stamps. The users loved it; said it really "jumped out at them".
>Should we stick with the pack or venture to new territory? I'm >wanting more real-world experience than conjecture. Thanks in >advance for all input.
Be brave, young man. Go with courage :^)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
