Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question)
But if we do things to anticipate the error of one user rather than the vast majority of our target audience, we'll be adding reams and reams of exceptions to our documents... they'll end up looking like they were created by the legal department from hell. Now if that one user could make a LETHAL mistake<snip>
From: "Ned Bedinger" <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>
Some design decisions are arbitrary, or based on intuition, anyway. A writer who needs a lot of hand-holding probably writes a lot of hand-holding into the manual. It would seem rather arbitrary to some of us.
On the matter of using "(Continued)", it would not take me more than one time, where I (or a reader) mis-interpreted a wrapped table, to conclude that using "(Continued)" is an element of good informational design. The cost of a mistake resulting from misreading a table might be a factor I would have to evaluate.
Mike Starr wrote:
Again, my whole point is that the use of "Continued..." is a waste of effort.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com
To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Follow-Ups:
- RE: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question), Gordon McLean
- Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question), Mike Starr
References:
Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question): From: Mike Starr
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question): From: Ned Bedinger
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question): From: Suzette Leeming
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question): From: Ned Bedinger
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question): From: Mike Starr
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question): From: Ned Bedinger
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question): From: Mike Starr
Previous by Author:
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question)
Next by Author:
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question)
Previous by Thread:
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question)
Next by Thread:
Re: Rant continued from previous page (was Re: Another Word guru question)
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads