TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
This is very useful. I think Quark can handle documents having 500 pages or
more, because it is used extensively for book publishing. However, I cannot
say the same for InDesign (Need to do a little more research). Indeed,
Framemaker is ideal for such docs, but it cannot match either of these
software in handling graphics within the context of the application. Thank
you once again for your valuable insight.
Raj
On 6/11/07, David Loveless <daveloveless -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>
> I have used both Quark and InDesign for the last several years.
> Personally, I find InDesign to be the Corvette to Quark's Ford Taurus.
> That isn't to say that Quark isn't useful, it is. However, I find
> InDesign to be easier to master and somewhat better with graphics. The
> other big concern is price. Quark by itself is quite expensive whereas
> InDesign can be packaged along with the entire creative suite for
> about the same price (at least that was true two years ago).
>
> As for 500 pages, I'm not sure about the capability of either program
> to handle a long doc like that. I have done a max of 200+ pages in
> both programs. For longer docs, most people would probably recommend
> FrameMaker, but I'm only minimally familiar with that and do not feel
> qualified to offer an opinion at this time.
>
> If you've got the time, download the demo version of both programs and
> play around a bit. I'm sure you'll find a good list of likes and
> dislikes for both programs. Either will likely work, but your manner
> of getting there is going to be different.
>
> Dave
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-