Re: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS

Subject: Re: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS
From: "Raj Machhan" <raj -dot- machhan -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "David Loveless" <daveloveless -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:39:51 +0530

Thanks David.

This is very useful. I think Quark can handle documents having 500 pages or
more, because it is used extensively for book publishing. However, I cannot
say the same for InDesign (Need to do a little more research). Indeed,
Framemaker is ideal for such docs, but it cannot match either of these
software in handling graphics within the context of the application. Thank
you once again for your valuable insight.

Raj

On 6/11/07, David Loveless <daveloveless -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>
> I have used both Quark and InDesign for the last several years.
> Personally, I find InDesign to be the Corvette to Quark's Ford Taurus.
> That isn't to say that Quark isn't useful, it is. However, I find
> InDesign to be easier to master and somewhat better with graphics. The
> other big concern is price. Quark by itself is quite expensive whereas
> InDesign can be packaged along with the entire creative suite for
> about the same price (at least that was true two years ago).
>
> As for 500 pages, I'm not sure about the capability of either program
> to handle a long doc like that. I have done a max of 200+ pages in
> both programs. For longer docs, most people would probably recommend
> FrameMaker, but I'm only minimally familiar with that and do not feel
> qualified to offer an opinion at this time.
>
> If you've got the time, download the demo version of both programs and
> play around a bit. I'm sure you'll find a good list of likes and
> dislikes for both programs. Either will likely work, but your manner
> of getting there is going to be different.
>
> Dave
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


References:
QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS: From: Raj Machhan
RE: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS: From: Pinkham, Jim
Re: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS: From: Raj Machhan
RE: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS: From: Pinkham, Jim
Re: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS: From: David Loveless

Previous by Author: Re: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS
Next by Author: Re: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS
Previous by Thread: Re: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS
Next by Thread: RE: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads