TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Online vs paper-based editing From:"Melissa Nelson" <melmis36 -at- hotmail -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:42:02 -0400
I generally attempt online editing, however if given the oppurtunity and
right circumstances, I prefer to edit on paper. I think this is simply
because that is how I learned how to edit back in the old days when I was
going to college the first time. I had to write everything out before
putting it on a typewriter...yikes, those were the days eh? There just seems
to be something almost refreshing and reassuring about being able to hold
what I am editing.
Just me showing my age. :)
Melissa
From: Diane Haugen <WhiskeyCreek -at- wcdd -dot- com>
To: "Jeannine Klein" <jmek66 -at- gmail -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Online vs paper-based editing
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:15:26 -0500
>At 5:35 PM -0700 6/18/07, Jeannine Klein wrote:
>
> >Do most of you edit on the computer screen or on a paper printout...Also,
> >do you know of any studies on the question? (I can't find anything in the
> >STC archives.)
> >
>
> From reading the early responses to your question, I would say that I
>am quite a bit in the minority regarding online editing versus paper
>editing. Probably because I do not do a lot of editing for industry,
>and because the editing I do is often more substantive editing rather
>than the kinds of changes which lean toward the copyediting end of
>the continuum.
>
>I have edited for publishing companies on line, but this kind of
>editing has always involved changes which did not change the order or
>structure of the document. I think this is the key issue with online
>editing as opposed to paper editing. If there are organizations
>changes, paper editing, at least for me, is necessary.
>
>When I was at Carnegie Mellon, now over fifteen years ago, there were
>a lot of researchers studying online editing as opposed to paper
>editing. Christine Haas was one of the students who specialized in
>this. However, I haven't been able to locate any of her work online
>just now. If the Document Design Center at Carnegie Mellon still
>exists, I'm sure you could get copies of some of their research
>documents done at that time involving online editing as opposed to
>paper editing.
>
>I do remember that Christine had documented that sentence level
>changes online worked well, but large organizational changes were
>difficult online because the editor lost track of the document's
>whole picture. That is, it's a lot harder to keep ten pages in your
>head and scroll back and forth between them moving parts around
>online than it is on paper.
>
>I find in my own writing that I can compose the first draft online,
>make many changes on line (usually the "through out and recast kind
>of changes," but once the document grows to a few pages, the large
>organizational changes that are needed simply do not show up without
>printing out the document and looking at it, preferably a day or so
>later.
>
>The reality is that in the workplace, this simply may not be
>possible, either because of time constraints or because by the time
>an editor gets the document in the workplace, the organization is
>fixed. However, I suspect some of your difficulty is that the whole
>issue of online editing versus paper editing involves a lot of
>variables which make it difficult to generalize.
>
>Diane
>--
>===============================
>Diane Haugen
>Whiskey Creek Document Design
>http://www.wcdd.com/index.html
>===============================
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
>printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
>Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
>http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
>True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
>Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
>documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as melmis36 -at- hotmail -dot- com -dot-
>
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/melmis36%40hotmail.com
>
>
>To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-