TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Making online reading/editing easier (was Online vs paper-based editing)
Subject:Re: Making online reading/editing easier (was Online vs paper-based editing) From:<neilson -at- windstream -dot- net> To:"Jim Morgan" <Jim -dot- Morgan -at- jdsu -dot- com>,<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:49:07 -0400
I use both methods. The on-line document is amenable to searching for
particular bad constructions and misspellings that won't show up in
MS-Wrod's checking software. But the dead tree has not died in vain--
badness that was invisible for weeks on the screen leaps from the
printed copy. Also, I can hand a printed copy to a boss who never
bothers with on-line stuff (he has people to deal with computers, so
he doesn't have to), and he just might read for content. Or perhaps
he'll make himself marginally useful and catch a "to" where "too" was
intended.
Jim Morgan correctly commented:
> I think there is something in the gestalt of seeing a page in the
> context, background, and medium in which hard-copy readers use it that
> helps me find things I do not pick up onscreen regardless of the display
> settings. I tried for a couple of years to go all-electronic, but when
> users brought me printouts for various issues, I kept finding minor
> mistakes. Perhaps if I had one of those fancy monitors that swivel to
> vertical and are large enough to show a page in true size I would have
> better luck. Then again, maybe my brain responds well to the tactile
> experience of paper and pen that I grew up with. Or maybe this is an
> issue of how one's optical system is hard-wired, such that some people
> will never be as good as others at catching everything onscreen.
>
> All I know is, after considerable experimentation over years, I have
> determined that I still need a final pass on paper to pick up the last
> 10% of detail errors.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-