Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on this

Subject: Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on this
From: Janice Gelb <Janice -dot- Gelb -at- Sun -dot- COM>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:09:24 +1100

Robert Lauriston wrote:
> Yeah, same here.
>
> There are iterative loops within this process, but overall, first I
> ask questions about the product, the answers tell me who the presumed
> users are and what they need to know, and only then am I in a position
> to outline the topics and outline the deliverables.

The answers to how the product works tell you
who the presumed users are? I think that only
works if the people who have designed the product
have done so with presumed users in mind, answering
the same sorts of questions about user needs that
some of us have been advocating here.

The features that the product provides are not always
the features that need to be emphasized in the documentation
for the presumed user. For example, I've seen features
included in software products because the designers
thought they were cool or were jazzed because they had
figured out a way to implement them, but they weren't
necessarily features that actual purchasers of the product
either wanted or really needed.

-- Janice

***********************************************************
Janice Gelb | The only connection Sun has with
janice -dot- gelb -at- sun -dot- com | this message is the return address
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on this: From: Keith Hood
Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on this: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on this: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: Re: Doc Design and Convention ( was TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 48, Issue 27)
Next by Author: Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on this
Previous by Thread: Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on this
Next by Thread: Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on this


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads