TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: We're Number 13! We're Number 13! From:"McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> To:voxwoman <voxwoman -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:13:27 -0500
The difference is that some of today's best (or most engaging... if there's a difference) SF might achieve the enduring status of mythology, but I'm pretty sure that none of my technical /f/i/c/t/i/o/n/ writing is going to last beyond next year.
Mythology = fiction of the past about the past
SF = fiction of the now about the (mythical?) future
I guess the other real difference (and the one that makes mythology more like techwriting, I suppose) is that when it was first composed, mythology thought to describe something that was supposed to have existence outside people's heads (in 'real' life)... but turned out to be fiction.
Comparing that to SF and to techwriting - SF _admits_ that it's fiction, right away. Ahem.
OMG! That means, techwriting is... <see earlier posts - fill in own conclusions>
- Kevin
________________________________
From: voxwoman [mailto:voxwoman -at- gmail -dot- com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 3:50 PM
To: McLauchlan, Kevin
Cc: Kat Kuvinka; john -at- garisons -dot- com; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: We're Number 13! We're Number 13!
I thought my science fiction background was my particular leg up (and I actually took a class in SF in the English Department at my university). A background in science AND fiction is the perfect combination for writing about software under development.
-Wendy
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:32 PM, McLauchlan, Kevin <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com<mailto:Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>> wrote:
Kat Kuvinka suggested:
> >
> > Software systems don't really exist ... sure, everyone SAYS
> they're zeroes
> > and ones on a whirling magnetic disc, but has anyone ever SEEN it?
> >
>
>
>
> Perhaps theology is the best background!
Theology/mythology.... same-same... possibly the department has a different name, but...
- Kevin (the debbil made me do it)
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.
Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at: http://www.doctohelp.com/
Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at: http://www.ModernAnalyst.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-