RE: A different "personality type" angle

Subject: RE: A different "personality type" angle
From: Heather Anderson <Heather -dot- Anderson -at- cubrc -dot- org>
To: "evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net" <evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net>, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:27:57 -0500

I follow baseball (Orioles) and Football (Steelers).

However brand loyalty - are you speaking specifically in the terms of sports teams or in general, (ie, the brand of brownies, I will always get!)?

But I don't think I have "fanaticism" in any way that I've noticed.


________________________________________
From: techwr-l-bounces+heather -dot- anderson=cubrc -dot- org -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [techwr-l-bounces+heather -dot- anderson=cubrc -dot- org -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net [evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 3:17 PM
To: Gene Kim-Eng
Cc: Kevin McLauchlan; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: A different "personality type" angle

I think Gene is right on here.

My only further comment RE: fandom is that, as a Bostonian, knowing where the BoSox stand durring the season (even if you don't watch the games) and making fun of anyone who wears Yankee paraphernalia in Massachusetts is as much a "religious" ritual and responsibility as it is a fan-statement. My experience is that most Yankee-fan baiting is given and taken in good humor.

Ev




I think the personality trait associated with brand loyalty is probably risk
aversion. Having found something that works (and perhaps having experienced an
alternative that didn't), the individual prefers to avoid the risk of another
negative experience.

Fanaticism is another matter. I can understand people being strongly attached
to their own preferences, but why some feel the need to convince or force others
to follow escapes me.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as Heather -dot- Anderson -at- cubrc -dot- org -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/heather.anderson%40cubrc.org


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
Re: A different "personality type" angle: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: A different "personality type" angle: From: evbarney

Previous by Author: RE: Ampersands in TOC and headers?
Next by Author: Style Guides
Previous by Thread: Re: A different "personality type" angle
Next by Thread: Re: A different "personality type" angle


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads