TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
So, basically, it's "second verse, same as the first." The W3C continues to evolve sensible, universal standards that promote device independence, and software companies continue to ignore it by producing competing products, using a dizzying array of dissimilar approaches; ones that confuse and complicate the field, as well as add needless expense for end users. This is all in the name of expedience and competitive advantage. If we all use the same standards, where is our selling proposition?
Bottom line: most of the effort that goes into writing competing, incompatible software, as well as adaptation to that poorly designed software, could be better spent innovating on top of consistent, standard platforms.
[In the process of putting away the soap box and going back to lurk mode]
On Jul 29, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Ed Marsh <lists -at- edmarsh -dot- com> wrote:
>
>
> There has been work in this area; it's known (for better or worse)
> as Responsive Web Design:
>
>
>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/
>
>
> Essentially it uses what's called CSS Media Queries to serve to each
> type of device.
>
> This approach is not for the faint of heart, nor the
> CSS-uninitiated, but is just one possibility.
>
> -=Ed.
>
> On Fri, 29 Jul
> 2011 15:39:47 -0500, John Allred wrote:
>
>> Having been out of the field
> for many years, I should apologize if I'm missing something that
> everyone else knows. But what you're describing is what we were talking
> about in web development fifteen years ago. You write one structured
> document and serve it with the appropriate CSS style sheet for the
> device in use. I find it hard to believe any tools have been developed
> in that time without this economical framework in mind. Well, on second
> thought, Microsoft never signed on for a neutral, standards-based web;
> why should anyone else?
>>
>> John Allred
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
> Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
> Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jack -at- allrednet -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/jack%40allrednet.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-