RE: New words - where have you found them?

Subject: RE: New words - where have you found them?
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:24:42 -0400

They say, "Wordnik offers definitions from dictionaries old and new, but
its real advantage is its trove of example sentences pulled from sources
ranging from Twitter to newspaper articles."

So why can't their algorithm find the word in a common online
dictionary, if I can?

And why would they quote one of our greatest neologists, without
defining the word in question?


-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Chung
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:13 AM
To: Dan Goldstein
Cc: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Subject: Re: New words - where have you found them?

Pish tosh. Boo hoo. And all that.

You can always submit a definition. Wordnik scans the net, primarily
to catch when new words trend. While not against classic terms,
Wordnik favors the madeupical, as defined by neologists, so as to not to
compete with Erin McKean's beloved New Oxford American Dictionary.

I'm just a fanboy.




This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
Re: Anyone Can Write - Just Look At The Job Descriptions: From: Ed
Re: Anyone Can Write - Just Look At The Job Descriptions: From: beelia
Re: Anyone Can Write - Just Look At The Job Descriptions: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: Anyone Can Write - Just Look At The Job Descriptions: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: Anyone Can Write - Just Look At The Job Descriptions: From: Ken Poshedly
RE: Anyone Can Write - Just Look At The Job Descriptions: From: Mark Baker
New words - where have you found them?: From: Tony Chung
Re: New words - where have you found them?: From: Laura Lemay
Re: New words - where have you found them?: From: Robert Courtney
Re: New words - where have you found them?: From: John Allred
Re: New words - where have you found them?: From: John Allred
RE: New words - where have you found them?: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: New words - where have you found them?: From: Tony Chung

Previous by Author: RE: New words - where have you found them?
Next by Author: RE: Advice on software testing?
Previous by Thread: Re: New words - where have you found them?
Next by Thread: Re: Anyone Can Write - Just Look At The Job Descriptions


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads