TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I guess I misspoke. None of the content from these documents is to be
repurposed.
What we're really looking for an easy-to-learn, easy-to-manage document *
retrieval* system that provides thorough indexing. This may include a tool
such as Documentum, provided that there are sufficient training aids
already available or consultants nearby (Sacramento) who provide bona fide
training.
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Don White <writer -at- jrtcllc -dot- com> wrote:
> Drupal is good, WordPress is good. I primarily use Joomla on sites I build
> for cash and pro-bono clients as well as for my own purposes. Perhaps its
> like the debates (never-ending debates) between Mac and Microsoft users.
>
> The fact is, though, that the concept of "easy-to-use" has changed along
> with the increased capabilities and complexities of current Web site
> development.
>
> People are not exempt from learning something HTML/XHTML because they chose
> a CMS. Not every peg fits into a square receptacle.
>
> There really are no separate Web pages on a CMS site; everything is driven
> by the design and implementation of menus since all content is stored and
> called from a database. You can create separate modules to present teasers
> or bits of content that incite interest to click the "Read More" (or
> something) link that brings up a complete article. Or you can setup menus
> to
> display full or partial articles where you've set the Read More link deeper
> in the content than the opening paragraph.
>
> The editor interfaces used by the various CMSs automatically assign
> HTML/XHTML tags to the more obvious content types (paragraph=p, bullet list
> item=li, etc.). However, if you make more complete use of the CSS
> possibilities built into a given template, you almost have to delve into
> the
> source code to assign the correct span tags (<p class="...;">).
>
> The promise of open-source content management systems was that a developer
> could deliver a site that a client can use to add, modify, or remove
> content
> without knowing XHTML/HTML or CSS. The reality is that, as design standards
> and expectations have matured, so has the complexity. I take the more
> flexible and popular of the CSS styles created by a template vendor and
> rewrite them in the template CSS file (there may be dozens of separate CSS
> files for any given template). Then, the client can select the desired
> styling from a drop-down menu in the editor.
>
> My own site is www.jrtcllc.com; a site I built for a commercial client is
>http://flsamerica.com and a site I built and maintain for a volunteer
> trail
> club is at http://www.southshenandoah.net. (I only wish that Internet
> Explorer was more compatible with current W3C standards.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Don White
> James River Technical Communications
>mailto:writer -at- jrtcllc -dot- com
> www.jrtcllc.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lauren [mailto:lauren -at- writeco -dot- net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 5:36 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: Content management
>
>
> On 7/31/2012 1:20 PM, Chris Morton wrote:
> > Once again I've been asked to poll you to learn what easy-to-use CMS
> > product you're using. Drupal has been offered up before, but I
> > understand that there is a significant learning curve for that
> > software. True? Other ideas?
>
> Drupal is very easy to use after several years of using it.
>
> > Specifically we're looking to manage a vast array of docs required for
> > FDA compliance.
>
> CMS is a deceptively simple concept. You risk making mistakes if you
> choose a CMS based on your needs today and not on your potential for
> growth. I began with WordPress and then chose Drupal because I wanted
> control over my system and I wanted a system that can begin simple but
> have a robust growth potential. WordPress also begins simple, but some
> areas of control and robustness are limited in WordPress.
>
> WordPress has a blog look and feel, but it can display different types
> of content in many different ways. The magazine for this list is built
> in WordPress.
>
>http://techwhirl.com/
>
> I built my animal law news site in Drupal. Most of the content comes
> from press releases, so I need more original content and some editing,
> but I have used various searches, views, and display tools to display
> the content in a variety of ways systematically.
>
>http://petlawnews.com/
>
> The top of the home page is a logo, login, search, and menus that are
> not fully configured. The second section contains three columns. The
> first column is a list of recent content headlines and teasers, the
> second column is a preview of a story and then headlines culled from
> promoted content and content I wrote, and the third column is an ad and
> a list of headlines of recently viewed content limited by content type.
> The third section is 12 Blocks (a Drupal module) that make use of
> various Drupal features. Most of the blocks are lists of headlines and
> are built with keyword searches, two are based on content type and
> source, and then there are two widgets.
>
> My pages still need development. The story pages have some design
> (e.g.,
>http://petlawnews.com/content/pgc-news-release-anyone-missing-wallaby)
> but the main section pages do not (e.g.,
>http://petlawnews.com/content/news). I can design different pages for
> different content types, different Views (a Drupal module) of content,
> different users, and in just about any other way I can come up with to
> access content. I do not care for coming up with design layouts, so I
> pretty much let my system spit out content. I'm a builder; not a
> designer. Drupal is very flexible for people who know how to use it,
> but very frustrating for those who do not.
>
> Building a site like this may be possible in WordPress, but I like that
> I can produce content in a variety of ways in Drupal. I originally
> built the second home page section with blocks in Drupal, but then
> abandoned those blocks for Panels (a Drupal module) that let me change
> the width and display of columns on the fly. Blocks are more rigid.
> The 12 blocks in the third home page section are still in blocks, but I
> may change that to Panels later. I am looking for a more automated
> process of building and enabling or disabling those blocks, hopefully
> with a combination of Views and Panels, rather than Blocks.
>
> So, when searching for a CMS, it is important to keep in mind what you
> need now and what you may need in the future. You also need to know if
> the CMS you choose now can be ported to a different CMS later if what
> you choose now does not fit well with your future needs. Many popular
> CMSs can be ported back and forth with some effort.
>
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
> Doc-To-Help.
> Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
>
> Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>
>http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as writer -at- jrtcllc -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
> Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
>
> Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>
>http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.