TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Taking active vs. passive voice too far From:Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> To:M -dot- Vina-Baltsas -at- mindray -dot- com Date:Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:19:59 -0700
Hi Michelle,
To respond to your first question:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:45 AM, <M -dot- Vina-Baltsas -at- mindray -dot- com> wrote:
> I'm working with a manual that was primarily written in the passive voice.
> I'm struggling with how far I should go with my edits.
>
Are you familiar with JPL's Levels of Edit? I have to be honest that I
haven't read the entire thing myself. However, I used to work for a company
that defined their levels of edit around JPL's. It also ties in with the
"exhaustive, fast, and cheap -- pick two" analogy.