Re: sorting numbers

Subject: Re: sorting numbers
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:47:54 -0400

On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:18:52 -0400, Laurie Little <llittle -at- words-tw -dot- com> wrote:

A client's documentation says "Numbers will sort alphabetically rather than in numeric order ...

That sorting looks to me like the naive "sort by ASCII value" (or EBCDIC value) that once commonly infested computer programming. The excuse was, "That's the way the computer does it," or (coming from the programmer) "Yes, we could code it to sort differently, but that would be too much trouble."

The sorting that you see is what happens if the individual numerals are each considered as characters in the alphabet, rather than as components of a numeric entity.

You can observe that the whole problem has been totally overcome in some venues. For example, Google search recognizes the spelled and the numeric versions of numbers as possible equivalents.

You are stuck having to document someone's excuse for poor software performance.

New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Previous by Author: Re: Master Documents in Word
Next by Author: Re: Why is so hard to for majority Chinese companies to take documentation seriously?
Previous by Thread: Re: sorting numbers
Next by Thread: Re: Sorting Numbers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads