Re: Resume styles

Subject: Re: Resume styles
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:39:50 -0800

My thoughts exactly. The primary goal is to make the resume highly
scannable, both by humans and software.

Some application software strips all the formatting out so keeping it
as simple as possible is best.

"I found .. the formatting more difficult to follow than other resumes
I have reviewed" is not something I would want to hear, but without
seeing it it's hard to guess whether there's anything to that or it's
just an outlier opinion.

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Julie Stickler <jstickler -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Because resumes are written for a different audience than web pages. Often
> resumes are parsed by machine to extract keywords. Resumes have to be easy
> to scan, because people often spend very little time on them before making
> a decision about the candidate.
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Resume styles: From: Chris Morton
Re: Resume styles: From: Bridget Gordan
Re: Resume styles: From: Julie Stickler

Previous by Author: Re: CMS recommendation?
Next by Author: Re: EML reader
Previous by Thread: Re: Resume styles
Next by Thread: RE: Resume styles

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads