Not content with the definitions for "content"

Subject: Not content with the definitions for "content"
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 07:51:49 -0700

So, (he says, in the best George Takei impersonation he can muster), oh
myyyyyyy. The Content Strategy Google Group, once lauded for its members'
interest in crowd sourcing for thoughts from the hive mind, has finally
encountered a thought so great to be unable to gain consensus from
the swarm.

Tongue in cheek? Meta abnormal? Weigh in on the discussion here, and bring
back your thoughts.!topic/contentstrategy/Zh1t8tNrYrQ

Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Previous by Author: Re: #talkpay hashtag on Twitter May 1
Next by Author: Re: What's the benefit in getting a PMP certification in project management?
Previous by Thread: Re: Alternative tool for creating & maintaining PowerPoint training decks?
Next by Thread: Re: Not content with the definitions for "content"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads