Re: Not content with the definitions for "content"

Subject: Re: Not content with the definitions for "content"
From: Milan DavidoviÄ <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 12:31:37 -0400

What do you think is the impact on their work of their not being able
to gain consensus. This has never been clear to me (which probably
says more about me than anything/anyone else).

--Milan DavidoviÄ

Sent from my Commercial Visible 6

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> wrote:
> So, (he says, in the best George Takei impersonation he can muster), oh
> myyyyyyy. The Content Strategy Google Group, once lauded for its members'
> interest in crowd sourcing for thoughts from the hive mind, has finally
> encountered a thought so great to be unable to gain consensus from
> the swarm.
Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Not content with the definitions for "content": From: Tony Chung

Next by Author: Re: What's the benefit in getting a PMP certification in project management?
Previous by Thread: Not content with the definitions for "content"
Next by Thread: Table layout - Which way is best?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads