RE: Not content with the definitions for "content"

Subject: RE: Not content with the definitions for "content"
From: Dan Comly <dcomly -at- b2wsoftware -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:57:54 +0000

Oh my. Two sentences immediately come to mind.

"It depends on what your definition of 'is' is."

"How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?"

Let the philosophers wrestle with this. I have information to convey as clearly as possible to the people who use the software my company sells. Please let me know when the dust settles.

Dan Comly

Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Previous by Author: RE: French spacing vs single space after punctuation.
Next by Author: RE: #talkpay hashtag on Twitter May 1
Previous by Thread: Re: Table layout - Which way is best?
Next by Thread: Re: Not content with the definitions for "content"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads