RE: manual vs white paper

Subject: RE: manual vs white paper
From: "Janoff, Steven" <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- hologic -dot- com>
To: Gina Jones <gina -dot- techwriter -at- gmail -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:16:25 +0000

Insert the content as is and, if allowed, perhaps put a note introducing it, including a link to the published version (PDF on the web?). Just something to distinguish it from the rest of the content in the manual. But if that's not acceptable, then you'll probably have to just insert it as is and bite the bullet.


On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:06 AM, Gina Jones wrote:

I was instructed to insert the content as is, with no revisions, since the content has already been published as a white paper.

Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

manual vs white paper: From: Gina Jones
Re: manual vs white paper: From: Ryan Haber
Re: manual vs white paper: From: Haim Roman
Re: manual vs white paper: From: Gina Jones

Previous by Author: RE: One space (or two) after a paragraph?
Next by Author: RE: Large Flare projects (2,000+ pages)
Previous by Thread: Re: manual vs white paper
Next by Thread: RE: manual vs white paper

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads