Re: [Framers] Heading Question

Subject: Re: [Framers] Heading Question
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:25:54 +0100

One exception to that rule: I use single child topics for
internal-only notes on the parent topic to be included in
for-internal-distribution-only version of the docs and excluded from
customer docs. That makes the internal-only topics appear in the TOC /
page nav / PDF bookmarks so they're more obvious.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Sean Brierley
<sean -dot- brierley -at- gerberscientific -dot- com> wrote:
> And, to add more thought about your approach in addition to what Fred said,
> avoid solo headings. Headings should exist at least in pairs at any given
> level.
> If you only need a single level-3 heading, get rid of it and include its
> content in the preceding level-2 section. Perhaps you might have to modify
> the level-2 section heading to accommodate the added content.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Re: [Framers] Heading Question: From: Sean Brierley

Previous by Author: Re: PDF filenames - include release designation ?
Next by Author: Re: PDF filenames - include release designation ?
Previous by Thread: Re: [Framers] Heading Question
Next by Thread: Need advanced DIR list

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads