TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:U.S. Copyright Regulations Question From:Robert Cianchette <rmc -at- DAVIDGE -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 11 Mar 1993 10:06:06 EST
Greetings,
I'm wondering if a kind reader could provide me with some definitive copyright
information. Specifically, I would like to know what the generally accepted
legal practice is for specifying copyright dates on continuously updated
publications (i.e. software and user manuals.)
I've seen examples such as "(c) 1987-1993" and "(c) 1987, 1989, 1993".
Should the copyright date reflect the years in which any new version/edition
of a work has been produced and distributed? Is it not considered sufficient
to note the date for the current version, assuming that previous versions
also stated their appropriate date? Is the idea that portions of the work
were published/copyrighted in these years, so it's wise to note all dates?
I'm not really interested in conjecture/opinion (I have more than enough
of my own, thanks!) as much as I am in getting a response from someone that
has first-hand familiarity with U.S. copyright regulations. I realize that
I should consult an intellectual property attorney, but my boss is too
"frugal" to follow this approach.