TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> I used the command SET DIGESTS in order to combine all messages in one file a
> day. However, the past days I've received these collective files as well as
the
> original messages. That's too much of redundancy, and moreover: my mailbox is
> even more expanding than before.
> Did I something wrong? Any solution?
Greetings-
It seems I broke a rule of writing: Write about what you know about.
Or a rule of tech writing: Try it before you describe it. Well, I'm
going to break it again because I want to get this out right away (and
I don't want digests myself). After another reading of the LISTSERV
reference card, it seems you _may_ need to send 2 commands to
LISTSERV -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU to get digests _instead_ of single
messages:
SET TECHWR-L DIGESTS
SET TECHWR-L NOMAIL
Will someone who is interested try this and report or someone who knows
more about list servers than I do post an authoritative answer?
Wishing I'd never brought this up... I remain,
Your faithful servant,
-Fred
--
INTERNET: fred -at- boole -dot- com PHONE: (408) 524-3292 FAX: (408) 730-0558
USPS: Fred Jacobson / Boole & Babbage / 510 Oakmead Pkwy / Sunnyvale CA 94086
