TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Reverse order print (fwd) From:Judith Wisdom <wisdom -at- UDCEMAIL -dot- UDC -dot- UPENN -dot- EDU> Date:Fri, 7 Jan 1994 02:09:02 EST
[Mistakenly, I posted this to just one person on the list although I had
intended it to be a list posting since it continues a discussion, with
latest info, thanks to responders, etc., although not on a very lofty
topic, I must admit. Since some of the responses came from personal
addresses I'm not sure which list they were seen on, but will post this
message--as well as the final resolution to the problem--to both lists to
which I posted my original query, in case anyone else out there is looking for
the solution that I am.]
JW
Judith Wisdom wrote:
> Wow to R. Bruce for taking the time to figure out and write so clearly the
> instructions for a macro to help me print backwards. I will try it over
> the weekend on a short document to see if using the macro is physically
> easier than restacking the pages. Of course I'll post my reaction ASAP.
> As for the gerryrigging solutions, thanks for the people who sent them.
> This bear of very little technical brain sometimes cannot for the life of
> me see how another tray would do it, though. With the HP Deskjet 500, the
> pages are thrust out face up, with page one coming first and thus sitting
> at the bottom of the
> pile. The solution would for it to come out face down in numerical order
> (1-n) or face up (as it does) but in reverse order (n-l), the latter of
> which seems like the only thing that is potentially manipulable by
> software or software commands. The former seems like it would require
> getting inside the printer and rebuilding it.
> Maybe RB's lovely macro will help. If it ends up being as tedious as
> manually restacking, which he worries about and thus, till I try it, I do,
> the suggestion box is still appreciatingly open.