TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re[2]: Why paper books From:Virginia Krenn <asdxvlk -at- OKWAY -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU> Date:Wed, 17 Aug 1994 18:21:24 CDT
One of the people I used to work with lost the entire on-line copy of
his program. He had to reenter every line from the hardcopy printout
that he had.
I wonder if the elder programmer in the story might have worried about
something like that happening. Or, maybe, he liked to be able to scan
the entire printout rather than paging through screens of data.
I hear some of you saying that my coworker should have had backups. He
did, in fact, have a backup. But, he had forgotten to fill out
authorization forms for the program. When file cleanup time came
around, his unauthorized programs were deleted.
This, and the earlier statements on this topic remind me of an exchange I
overheard between two youthful programmers. They were discussing one of
their elders, and how hard a time they were having getting him separated
from his precious listings. He was known for always insisting on storing in
his cube hardcopy listings of every program he ever wrote, despite the fact
the programs were backed up from here to eternity.
"He doesn't think it's a program unless he can hold it in his hand!"
Is that where we're coming from? The value of documentation is best
measured in pounds or cubic feet?