TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Sam Clemens is dead From:Richard Mateosian <srm -at- C2 -dot- ORG> Date:Mon, 3 Oct 1994 08:32:20 -0700
>Well, I might very well agree with you on many of these points. But until
>you tell me, specifically, what those points are, I can neither agree nor
>disagree. And I certainly can't argue with you. I'm surprised I indulged you
>this much.
Thanks for your indulgence. I didn't really want an argument. I'm glad you
took time to think about the points I made.
Let me expand on points one and two by saying that I believe that there are
more significant paths through the software and more relevant interactions
of features than you could possibly include in a 1000-page manual in 9-point
type. Therefore, it seems to me, that (1) you can't learn (meaning
understand completely) the software (meaning all of its features and
interactions) from a manual, and (2) it's only going to get worse as
programs get bigger and more complex. ...RM
Richard Mateosian Technical Writer in Berkeley CA srm -at- c2 -dot- org
