TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I'm impressed with the counting, measuring, software vs. hardware
analyses, and I wish I had some erudite addition, but all I have is:
not using the article sounds pretentious, as in, "Doctor will talk to
you now."
jb
========================
To make it all clearer, here's some examples with the *real* name.
"Broadband Network Analyzer can do some amazing stuff."
"The Broadband Network Analyzer can do some amazing stuff."
"Use Broadband Network Analyzer to perform blah blah tasks."
"Use the Broadband Network Analyzer to perform blah blah tasks."
Now what do you think? Thanks very much to those who have already replied.
Could
you please let me know if this changes your minds?
Ain't grammar fun! :-)
Sonja
sonja -at- hpato -dot- aus -dot- hp -dot- com
