Re: 50-ohm or 50 ohm--prof. style guides

Subject: Re: 50-ohm or 50 ohm--prof. style guides
From: Dan Voss <Daniel_W_Voss -at- CCMAIL -dot- ORL -dot- MMC -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 13:21:00 -0400

The 50-ohm discussion has been interesting, but I really don't see where the
hyphen is even remotely negotiable. Any standard Freshman Composition textbook
(e.g., the venerable Harbrace) would clearly identify this example as a 14-
carat unit modifier, which MUST take a hyphen. Period. End of discussion.
--Conan the Grammarian

I side with your copyeditors who put the hypen in
50-[uom] resistors because 50-[uom] is used as an adjective
and the hyphen reduces ambiguity.

You can easily settle such arguments by

1. Finding out if the professional organization
that most of your engineers belong to has a style guide

2. Obtaining copies of the style guide

3. Follow the guide as your "first reference"

4. Distribute copies of it to the engineers

We use the _SPE Publications Style Guide_ by the Society of
Petroleum Engineers as our first reference. Since it is "their"
organization and not "ours," they resist arguing with us
on the items that it covers. It is a slim book, and it
certainly does not cover everything.

LaVonna
LaVonna F. Funkhouser Immediate Past President, OK Chapter
lffunkhouser -at- halnet -dot- com Program Manager, 1995 Region 5 Conf.
technical writer Society for Technical Communication
COREStaff Communication Svcs.

My opinions do not officially represent anyone other than me.


Previous by Author: Re: Re. Virtually terminal
Next by Author: Bottom Line on 50-Ohm...
Previous by Thread: 50-ohm or 50 ohm--prof. style guides
Next by Thread: Re: 50-ohm or 50 ohm--prof. style guides


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads