TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Technical Writer vs. Information Developer From:Mike Christie <mikec -at- SYNTEL -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 11 Aug 1995 09:22:09 -0700
Stuart Burnfield writes:
> My business cards are mute on the subject. If I have to come up with a
> title when dealing with other businesses, I say something like Senior
> Documentor or Documentation Manager, though these are very grand names
> for the head of a very small group. When I go to the toilet, the
> Documentation Division is unattended.
Likewise here. When the company re-organized and I got to select my own
title, I chose Senior Information Developer (in spite of the advice to
the contrary I got from this list at the time). While I know that a very
large number of people who have the title of Technical Writer or Senior
Technical Writer or some varation thereof write on-line help and on-line
documentation, somehow the term still suggests to me printed manuals.
Information Developer suggests that I am writing, preparing, and
organizing information for use by (someone) and that that information may
be developed and distributed in any of a number of forms.
And, if I were to move on to another firm where I was told my title was
to be Senior Technical Writer, it's certainly not enough of an issue that
I would make any kind of a fuss about it.
Mike Christie
Senior Information Developer
SyntelSoft, Inc.
mikec -at- syntel -dot- com
