TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Seeking training in DC area From:Loren Castro <lfc -at- SOL -dot- CHINALAKE -dot- NAVY -dot- MIL> Date:Thu, 17 Aug 1995 16:42:01 -0700
Sherrill Fink flatters us:
> I was wondering if the omniscient techwhirlers know of some
> training courses for writing/editing in the DC area. Also
> acceptable are VA, MD, and NC. I am required to take a certain
> amount of training every year, and I am seeking options. When
> I say "training," I mean classes a week long or shorter, not
> semester-long classes.
I recommend a class called "Scientific and Technical Report Writing"
brought to us last May by one of these itinerant consulting companies:
The Communications Skills Company, Inc.
P.O. Box 1429
Huntsville, AL 35807-0429
205-536-8734
John Hightower, the "CEO and sole stockholder," presented the intense,
four-day class and made us think and work.
Sherrill requested private responses, but I'm posting this to pass
along some information that I learned in the class that might have
some application outside the DOD. Mr. Hightower does not practice
as a lawyer, but he has a JD degree and is interested in legalities
in writing. Suppose a contract (or specification) required "either
X or Y" somewhere and "A and B" somewhere else. Mr. Hightower states
that the words must be "either X or Y but not both" and "both A and B"
in order to be legally binding. He states further that the Government
has lost lawsuits because of the incorrect wording. I have a hard time
imagining the Government's insistence on accepting only X or Y and the
contractor's insistence on delivering both, but I suppose it happens.
I can only guess, but I suppose it could happen in civilian work also.