Re: the document development process

Subject: Re: the document development process
From: Bonni Graham <bonnig -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 10:21:00 -0800

Tammy Hale asks:

>But before we get started discussing how to improve the process, I would be
>interested in hearing what the document development consists of for other
>people.

For me as an independent, it varies greatly by customer, or at least it HAS.
Lately I've become tired of my clients' lack of organization causing me to
produce documentation with which I am not satisfied, let alone happy.

So I picked up a copy of Joann Hackos' Managing Your Documentation Projects and
am beginning to implement her suggestions. Based on the suggestions and
templates in the book I have instituted a number of practices (independent of
how
the client manages their end of the project):

o We create at least one Project Notebook for each and every project. It
contains:
o a copy of the Information Plan (per Managing...)
o a copy of the contract
o if the contract does not contain them, a list of contact names, phone
numbers, and email addresses
o a printed set of screen shots, each with a header indicating the date taken
and the date of the executable. This gets updated as the screen change. I
also try to note how many times the screen has changed.
o an outline of the proposed doc set (my sketchier version of Joann Hackos'
Content Specification; we're still just beginning to use and understand the
method)
o a milestone project plan showing deliverable dates
o (when the project is over) a copy of the Postmortem Project Review Minutes

o We create a plan to approach the doc set and always talk about any significant
changes to the plan.

o We follow the plan we create.

o We specify and deliver at least two review versions to the client, complete
with return deadlines and a checklist of items to review for. The client is
always free to add to the checklist, but they need to sign the list before
returning the review copy to us.

NOTE: I have one client where I'm supplementing an existing documentation
department (as opposed to BEING their doc department). I don't enforce the
checklist with them, because so far it has been unnecessary. I get quality
feedback without having to sit on them).

o We create a milestone project plan (currently using Microsoft Project).

o We track things like estimates and how close we are to them and our actual
hours per topic or page in a Microsoft Access database for future use.

So far client approval of this has been high. We always know if and why we're
going to be late (which is much rarer, so far). We always know exactly what's
coming up and what we're supposed to be doing.

I'd be interested in seeing how this matches up to other people's processes,
since one of our goals in continual process improvement.


--
Bonni Graham
Manual Labour
bonnig -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com


Previous by Author: Certification Redux (short)
Next by Author: Re: TW on the development team (long)
Previous by Thread: Re: the document development process
Next by Thread: [no subject]


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads