TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Looking for words From:Alexia Prendergast <alexiap -at- SEAGATESOFTWARE -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 6 May 1997 16:46:27 -0400
Parent and child are the industry standards --
perhaps we can think of better terms if you tell
us why you want to deviate from the standard?
--
Alexia Prendergast
Senior Technical Writer
Seagate Software
alexiap -at- sems -dot- com
>----------
>From: Len Olszewski[SMTP:saslpo -at- UNX -dot- SAS -dot- COM]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 1997 4:17 PM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: Looking for words
>
>In article <8625648F:006BC57C -dot- 00 -at- gpsnotes8 -dot- gps -dot- com>, RJACOBSE -at- gps -dot- com writes:
>|> I'm looking for alternatives to the words "parent" and "child" to describe
>|> entities in a outline-like conceptual structure. One alternative for
>|> "child" is "dependent," but I can't think of an easily aprehended analog
>|> for "parent."
>|>
>|> Is parent/child good enough, or are we overlooking some obvious
>|> alternatives?
>
>"Main" and "subordinate" seem to work here. You could try "primary" and
>"subordinate", or if you need other levels, "primary", "secondary",
>"tertiary", and so forth.
>
>You might consider a containment metaphor, where the parent elements
>would be "exterior", and the child elements "interior" with the notion
>of "peer" elements at some given level of containment.
>
>Hope this helps.
>--
>Len O. "I would rather be cynically accurate than
>saslpo -at- unx -dot- sas -dot- com inoffensively euphemistic." - Me
>***Opinions you see here? Mine, all mine.***********************
>
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
>to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
>browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
>
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
