Re: ATM vs. TrueType

Subject: Re: ATM vs. TrueType
From: "Wilcox, John (Contractor)" <wilcoxj -at- WDNI -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 11:19:00 -0700

----------
From: M. Dannenberg
.
.
There is, however, a problem, if you are using Acrobat Distiller in
Windows 95. If you generate a PDF file from a Postscript file, where the
original document contained Truetype fonts, the resulting PDF file will
not be searchable, because the Truetype fonts are stored as outlines
only. To create a PDF file with searchable text you need ATM fonts.
.
.
-----------------
Are you using Acrobat 3.0? 3.0 recognizes TrueType fonts in PostScript
files. This is a major enhancement in 3.0.


Regards,

John Wilcox, Documentation Specialist
Timberlands Information Services
Weyerhaeuser, WWC 2E2
Tacoma, WA 98477-0001 USA
253-924-7972 wilcoxj -at- wdni -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: alternative to ATM -- clarification
Next by Author: Re: ATM vs. TrueType
Previous by Thread: Re: ATM vs. TrueType
Next by Thread: Re: ATM vs. TrueType


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads