Re: Eliminating Need for Technical Support

Subject: Re: Eliminating Need for Technical Support
From: Sunil Gokhale <sunilg -at- PUNE -dot- TCS -dot- CO -dot- IN>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 10:04:16 +0530

From the discussion of Stuart Burnfield and Stephen Blount, I wondered
whether we could define what `good' documentation was - The word `Good'
has so many shades - that will be possible to define GOOD DOCUMENTATION.

Apart from being clear and simple, easy to understand are there certain
specific topics where the `goodness' could be seen and metered. Let me
list a few -
1. It should be well structured, so that browsing is easier - the internal
and external structure should be streamlined.
2. Matter should be specific, to-the-point.
3. It should be able to cross language barriers.

Anyone who wishes to add ?

Sunil Gokhale, Technical Communicator
Tata Consultancy Services
sunilg -at- pune -dot- tcs -dot- co -dot- in

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: FW: Where is everybody?
Next by Author: Re: Footers for Beta documentation
Previous by Thread: Eliminating Need for Technical Support
Next by Thread: Playing Hardball (was: Client Wants to Charge ...)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads