TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re[2]: sans serif fonts From:annasoj -at- EXABYTE -dot- COM Date:Thu, 24 Jul 1997 10:00:41 MDT
Serifs are the little tails (like Times font). Sans serif means
without serif (like Helvetica).
anna
annasoj -at- exabyte -dot- com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: sans serif fonts
Author: DWeber <dweber -at- HARRIS -dot- COM> at UNIXMAIL
Date: 7/24/97 9:52 AM
From what I understand, the meaning of sans serif is "with curves"
right? So I would assume just by definition, that a serif font that is
more basic, would be easier to read. I don't know. I think it just
depends on the whole picture: layout design, use of graphics, and of
course, white space (our dear friend). It seems to me that it is a
preference issue...although some would argue that there is a distinct
answer.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: sans serif fonts
Author: Dianne Walsh <ldwalsh -at- voicenet -dot- com> at smtp
Date: 7/24/97 11:38 AM
Buck wrote: the argument for sans serif fonts is indefensible.
Well, here's a defense:
My company publishes some of its smaller manuals as booklets; i.e., = pages
are set up in Word at full size and then we use a print utility to =
literally "shrink" them to half-size. It didn't take us long to find out =
that serif fonts looked terrible and were virtually unreadable when =
reduced. We got much better--and more readable--results using a sans = serif
font (good ol' Arial).=20
Someone else--I think it was Pat Gantt--said that she had understood =
that research showed sans serif fonts to be more readable. I've read =
that too, somewhere. She wasn't making it up.
_________________________________________________________________________=
Dianne Walsh
documentation Manager
Visit the Last of the Red Hot Cybermamas at = http://www.voicenet.com/~ldwalsh
_________________________________________________________________________=
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
