TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Not anthropomorphic at all, IMHO. But would "search" have been anthro
two decades ago? Probably. We hadn't been exposed to modern word
processing with its "find" and "replace" features. But today the
"search" references in software are part of the mainstream, and we as a
culture have developed a higher understanding of software processes
Of course, I'd be interested to read alternatives anyone might suggest.
>> > > I wrote "When you enter a word or phrase in one of the fields,
>> > > the system will search for exact matches." What is wrong with this
>>phrase[?]
>> > > It sort of gives the system a personality then, but what makes that a
>>bad thing?
>
>> > In my opinion, this is not anthropomorphic at all. You're not saying
>> > 'the system will be happy' or 'this makes the computer feel useful'.
>
>> Many PROGRAMMERS do this because they really, honestly, truly, believe
>> that computers ARE HUMAN.
>
>I don't know if that's really the reason or if it's just mental
>shorthand, but you do hear things like "this program _expects_ to_ find_
>it's_ DLLs in the .\DLL directory," and "that program _wants_ to_ see_
>EPS files, not BMP files."
>
>Clearly anthropomorphic -- but sometimes it's more important to go with
>the "clearly" than to avoid the "anthropomorphic."
>
>Regards,
>
>--
>Scott Herron | sherr19 -at- idt -dot- net
>
>That "deep thoughts" bit at the bottom.
>
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
>to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
>browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
>
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
