Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: Debbie Molinaro <debbiem -at- UCS -dot- NET>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 22:26:20 -0400

> From: Matt Ion <soundy -at- rogers -dot- wave -dot- ca>

> If I were to start using "scott" in reference to something negative, and
> over time that caught on so that the most common usage of the word was in
> reference to that that negative thing, would you then change your name
> because of its "negative connotations"?
>
> I rest my case.

What about guys named Richard, who used to take the nickname Dick? Some
still use that nickname (mostly folks from before the '60s) but a whole
bunch don't because of the "negative connotations."
I rest your case too.

Debbie

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Pet peeve words
Next by Author: Re: "xxx." or "xxx".
Previous by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads