[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: BC/AD vs BCE/CE

Subject: Re: BC/AD vs BCE/CE
From: Miark <miark -at- MIJENIX -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 16:06:29 -0600

>Apparently so: it's actually 15,576,984,685 (revised last month after
>analysis of data recovered from the Hubbell telescope).
>
>Of course, this dating method may offend Christian or other fundamentalists
>who have a non-big bang approach to creation...


Spoken like a true Science fundamentalist.

Mike

Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.


Previous by Author: Thanks: Importing Ventura files into Other Applications
Next by Author: BC/BCE--Stand down
Previous by Thread: Re: BC/AD vs BCE/CE
Next by Thread: Re: BC/AD vs BCE/CE

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads