TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: The Holy Wars -- LAME! From:Andrew Plato <aplato -at- EASYSTREET -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 8 Jan 1998 13:17:10 -0800
Wow, this really has sparked a lot of responses (I've received about 45
private emails since this morning). Its a good thing I am offline today and
not at a client site.
I just wanted to say that I too feel like I did the right thing, but it was
not without feeling icky. It is hard when a client asks for my opinion, but
I know some people don't want to hear it. In my defense, they asked for my
opinion and a recommendation. I was well and good to stay out of the wars.
I have seen lots of companies become paralyzed with holy wars and it is
really pathetic. I usually just stay out of the way when I am contracting
and let the full-timers duke it out.
As it was, this client decided to standardize simply based on costs and
portability needs. I did not encourage them to standardize to Word. The
decision was already made before I got there. I just supported that
decision.
Thanks again for the input everyone.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Plato <aplato -at- easystreet -dot- com>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.techwr-l
Date: Wednesday, January 07, 1998 9:06 PM
Subject: The Holy Wars -- LAME!
>You know, I am getting a little tired of the tech writer holy wars. I have
>one that just started at a client's site. It is a Word/Frame war and it
is
>really pathetic. Both are good tools -- but to stake your entire career
>around one tool. Sheesh, how lame can you be?
>
>At this client site, they decided to standardize to Word. All of the
>engineers, marketing people, etc. used Word for all the internal docs so it
>seemed natural to do everything in Word. Since they produce pretty simple
>documentation and help files, I thought it was a good idea and started
>helping them design some templates and such. Word is a pretty good tool.
>Frame is too. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. For this company,
>Word seemed like a good choice. They were not doing really large documents
>and needed portability between other departments (which know nothing about
>Frame).
>
>Then this one lazy, worthless jerk who works there got his panties in an
>enormous bunch because he will ONLY use Frame. You can imagine what
>happened next. The sides squared off and here I was, the lone consultant
>stuck in the middle while these morons spent countless afternoons debating
>and NOT WORKING.
>
>So I went to the upper management and, in my best consulting voice, told
>them they had a full scale insurrection happening with the tech pubs
>department. Naturally, the big guys asked for my opinion.
>
>I told them to lay down the law and make it final: that the company had
made
>a business decision to standardize to one tool and one platform. I told
>them that this decision was made on both technological and economic
factors.
>That the inconvenience of converting to a single tool was minor in
>comparison to the benefits. I also warned them that the Fundie-Framers
>would seethe and they would probably rebel with bad productivity.
>
>Then I gave my regular line about technology holy wars: holy wars are
>destructive to an organization. They cause people to waste time on useless
>debating and arguing. Moreover, a holy warn can divide a team and cause
>miscommunication and resentment. This leads to bad products and lost
>profits. My suggestion was to deal with the instigators very sternly. The
>company must make it clear that the personal opinions regarding technology,
>however well supported, are to be kept personal once a decision is made.
>That personal preferences about technology and tools will be met when
>appropriate, but the first priority was producing good documents and good
>products. I also suggested that they keep the most vocal opponents in
>positions where they have little authority.
>
>The company seems to be following what I suggested. They had a long talk
>with that one guy who was driving me nuts. I think they sort of laid it on
>the line with him -- either play ball or strike out. Ha has kind of
quieted
>down ever since the talk.
>
> Sheesh, when is this dipstick going to learn that tools do not produce
good
>documentation -- good writers do. A good writer can produce useful
>documents with any tool.
>
>Well, what do you think? Did I do the right thing by telling the mangers
to
>crush the holy war people? I feel kind of icky about being the guy who
told
>them to reprimand these people. I feel like a nark.
>
>But, I also think that the holy war crap is really, really lame. Come on,
>are we professionals or are we cult members?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>Andrew Plato
>Owner / Principal Consultant
>Anitian Technology Services
>www.anitian.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>