TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Writing samples and portfolios From:Martha J Davidson <editrix -at- SLIP -dot- NET> Date:Mon, 26 Jan 1998 11:35:20 -0800
Well, I feel old enough to qualify for the grey team, though my hair
retains its original brown color... That said, I, too, bring a tote bag
full of books as samples rather than a portfolio to interviews.
At my last interview, just over two years ago, I showed several of those
samples to the folks interviewing me. I can't remember now whether they
asked or I offered the samples and they were too polite not to look at
them. The samples prompted some interesting and useful discussions, but I
don't know how much they influenced the decision to hire me.
At 11:33 AM 1/25/98 -0800, joanne grey wrote:
>
>I (a greying head if not grey beard) always bring a few samples, and am
>either not asked to show them, or the interviewer looks at them politely
>but cursorily. It seems to me that because:(a) they may not be all my
>work, (b) they might not even be my work at all, or (c) the interviewer
>has criteria that don't require samples - including some that just like
>to use conversation to see if the interviewee has a good command of the
>language, they have become if not irrelevant, at least relegated to the
>back seat.
I don't know why interviewers don't look at samples, though all of your
reasons make sense. I know that I consider writing samples a crucial part
of the process when I interview potential writers. I have had enough
experiences over the years where a person seemed perfect for a job, but the
samples indicated otherwise. Conversely, I have also been in a situation
where I considered a writing sample absolutely wonderful and the writer did
not work out at all after we hired her.
I think, as others have said in this thread, that it is important to ask
about how samples were created, and what a person might have done
differently given different schedules or style constraints. Sometimes that
gives me more information than either the general interview questions or
the content of the samples presented.
>I think that showing your real personality - including chutzpah -
>instead of what you think the interviewer is looking for will ultimately
>serve everyone much better. Often, it's the personality match that is
>the hardest to get.
>
I agree completely with this. The more genuine a person is during an
interview, the better sense I have that I will be able to work with him or
her. And the better sense he or she will have about being able to work
with me.
martha
--
Martha Jane {Kolman | Davidson} mailto:editrix -at- slip -dot- net
Senior Technical Writer
"If I am not for myself, who will be for me?
If I am only for myself, what am I?
If not now, when?"
--Hillel, "Mishna, Sayings of the Fathers 1:13"