Re: re Pros and Cons of including writer's name

Subject: Re: re Pros and Cons of including writer's name
From: Scott Miller <smiller -at- CORP -dot- PORTAL -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 11:51:33 -0700

Waste of paper. Provides no useful information. The only useful
convention-type info I've seen is how to read syntax stuff, like [stuff
in brackets is optional], and also what language programming examples
are written in. Otherwise, stuff like "key names are presented in
all-caps bold" is self-evident.

- Scott Miller
smiller -at- portal -dot- com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------

> <<...Maybe the manual has a "Conventions Used in this Guide" section
> (Good
> grief!!!)...>>
>
>
> What's wrong with a Conventions Used section?
>




Previous by Author: Re: Objectives on resumes and other stuff
Next by Author: Re: Was Pros and Cons of including writer's name; now conventions used
Previous by Thread: Re: re Pros and Cons of including writer's name
Next by Thread: FWD: Re: re Pros and Cons of including writer's name


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads