TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Probaby very similar - plastic comb spiral binding. Made primarily by a
company called "GBC Binding Systems", available in most office supply
stores in Canada.
Suzette Leeming
-----Original Message-----
From: Sara Schertz [SMTP:SSchertz -at- INTERFACESOFTWARE -dot- COM]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 9:47 AM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: Binding costs
Suzette -
What is cerloxing binding? My company is looking at alternatives for our
manuals, which really need to lay flat. We are currently using double-o
spiral bound, but it has two major disadvantages:
Can't put on shelf and still see the book title
Binding adds width to the book -- making it difficult to fit in
the box!!
Thanks,
Sara Schertz
Interface Software, Inc.
sschertz -at- interfacesoftware -dot- com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suzette Seveny [mailto:sseveny -at- PETVALU -dot- COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 8:39 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Binding costs
>
>
> My rule of thumb has been that the type of documentation
> determines the
> binding. If it will be referred to often, either a binder or
> cerloxing
> works best because it lays flat. Cerloxing is actually not
> very expensive,
> and can usually be done inhouse.
>
> For more reference/technical types of documentation that are
> only referred
> to occasionally, some type of thermal or cloth binding, similar to the
> Docutech type, works well. Again, not that expensive.
>
> Suzette Leeming
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Damien Braniff [SMTP:Damien_Braniff -at- PAC -dot- CO -dot- UK]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 7:55 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Binding costs
>
> Currently we supply the lit (reasonably largish manuals, 200+
> pages) in an
> A4 binder with dividers for each of the sections. It's been
> a bit of a
> historical thing and been built up over the years. Each
> section can "stand
> alone" and has it's own contents page where appropriate. There is no
> overall contents apart from section titles and no index
> (doesn't make it
> very friendly).
>
> What I'm looking at is making each section a chapter and have
> an overall
> contents and add an index (as discussed before on the list -
> all in Word!).
> What has now been suggested is to either move to an A5 binder
> to make it
> more manageable (though harder to read) or to go the whole
> hog and have it
> bound as a book. My main reservation is that we've had 3
> releases/updates
> in the last 18 months and I feel we'd need to sell a lot to
> make it worth
> while going to a bound book.
>
> Has anyone had experience of going down this road? Pros/cons?
>
> TIA
>
> Damien Braniff
> Technical Author
> PAC International
>
> &^&^&^&^&^~~~
> Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
> TECHWR-L)
> Check out topic summaries at
>http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/topics.htm
> Send all
>
> &^&^&^&^&^~~~
> Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
> TECHWR-L)
> Check out topic summaries at
>http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/topics.htm
> Send all
>
>