Re: Anonymity (was Request to Subscribers - Clarified)

Subject: Re: Anonymity (was Request to Subscribers - Clarified)
From: Guy McDonald <guy -at- NWLINK -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:55:37 -0700

>I am never afraid to stand behind what I have said, WHEN I have said it
with <snip>would never have sent the post, if I
had known my name would appear with it.

Eric Ray extends a courtesy for *those* type of posts... forwarded
anonymous.

>I don't remember being advised that this would be the case, but perhaps new
list subscribers should be warned that their names will appear so they can
plan their posts accordingly.

If some clown on this list holds a faux pas against you... to heck with that
person. If your manager is worth his/her paycheck, then the problem will be
addressed so that your relationship and product improves. If not... then
seek a happier location. :)

Guy McDonald
guy -at- nwlink -dot- com
"The flexible cannot be broken" Wong Fung Doo, famous outhouse poet




Previous by Author: Re: Volunteer TW Services (was: Ethical Questions)
Next by Author: Mathematic Symbols
Previous by Thread: Anonymity (was Request to Subscribers - Clarified)
Next by Thread: Re: Anonymity (was Request to Subscribers - Clarified)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads