TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Software Piracy (WAS: Good/bad docs) From:"Engstrom, Douglas D." <EngstromDD -at- PHIBRED -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 13 Aug 1998 09:06:04 -0500
************************
So the company that a list member works at excels at reinventing the
wheel. I can think of better ways to spend my time than by doing that.
:D
************************
Well, Michelin, Goodyear, etc. make a rather good business of
re-inventing the wheel, year in and year out. If you can create a
better, more usable wheel by doing so, and it benefits your company &
users to have a better wheel, why not? If you can think of better ways
to spend your time, feel free to do so.
************************
If a person doesn't have any confidence in Microsoft documentation,
why use their software? It's got to be just as bad, if I follow the
logic as presented.
************************
No logic concerning the relationship between suitability of code a
suitability of documentation was presented. Microsoft produces software
that is "good enough" for most of our uses, and offers the advantages of
using widely-accepted software: compatibility with other products,
off-the-shelf training, and reasonable assurance that the vendor will be
around next week. They don't produce, in our opinion, a suitable
documentation set and we don't use it. The two circumstances don't have
much to do with each other.
> ************************
> Companies like this not only fail in the long run, they
> also make the lives of their sys admins that much more unbearable
> during regular business hours by not letting their employees get up to
speed.
> ************************
> Nope. Sorry. Pioneer Hi-Bred is 72 years young, and we're the people
> you have contend with if you want to be a player in the North American
> agricultural seeds business. (And not insignificant in most other
> parts of the world, either.)
************************
[George Mena] How does this relate to technical writing?
************************
It was a rebuttal-by-example of your over-broad and rather churlish
assertion that companies that don't purchase the MS doc set are
substandard across the board and doomed to early failure.
Skoal,
Doug Engstrom
engstromdd -at- phibred -dot- com
############################################
My opinions only, not those of Pioneer
Hi-Bred International, Inc.
############################################