TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>Both use speech recognition, as opposed to voice
>recognition. Simple system navigation works very well with little or no
training.
>With an hour or so put into training, dictation of discreet speech runs
upward of
>90-95wpm.
Does this mean that if one person trains it for an hour or so, it can
produce corrected type at 90-95wpm from anyone's speech? If so, it is far
better than anything I have ever heard of, how much is it?
