Re: This Angers Me: Challenging and oppressive SME situation

Subject: Re: This Angers Me: Challenging and oppressive SME situation
From: George Mena <George -dot- Mena -at- ESSTECH -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 15:23:33 -0700

If the SME is a listmember, I have no problem hearing her side of the
story.

In the meantime, I can use that printer's rule as a backscratcher (it is
Friday, remember). :D

George

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda K. Sherman [SMTP:linsherm -at- GTE -dot- NET]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 1998 2:43 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: This Angers Me: Challenging and oppressive SME situation
>
> I am really angered by the overall response to this posting.
>
> On the basis of an ANONYMOUS poster's OBVIOUSLY one-sided,
> self-serving,
> and self-flattering account, there has been a stampede to condemn the
> faceless SME without benefit of hearing her side of the story. All of
> you would be livid if someone did that to you, but apparently it's
> okay
> if you do it to someone else.
>
> Six whacks of the printer's rule to the lot of you.
>
> L.
> --
> Linda K. Sherman <linsherm -at- gte -dot- net>
> Computer Consulting Services -- http://www.cti-pro.com
> Dysgwch Gymraeg! Learn Welsh! -- http://www.dalati.com
>
>
> ======================================================================
> =====
> Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
> TECHWR-L)
>


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Call the bully's bluff (WAS: Oppressive SMEs)
Next by Author: Credibility (WAS: Texts on Grammar)
Previous by Thread: Re: This Angers Me: Challenging and oppressive SME situation
Next by Thread: Re: This Angers Me: Challenging and oppressive SME situation


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads