TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: A replacement for "implementation" From:John Gilger <JohnG -at- MIKOHN -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:45:16 -0700
DCOM has these limitations:
{bullet list}
Keep It Short 'n' Sweet <G>
"current implementation" is a weasel phrase that adds no information to the
sentence. After all you are documenting the latest and greatest release of
your product (unless you are a historian). Does this product have any
"uncertain limitations"?
My $0.02 worth
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Rowena Hart [mailto:rhart -at- INTRINSYC -dot- COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 1998 9:37 AM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Q.: A replacement for "implementation"
How would you rewrite "...the current implementation of DCOM
has certain limitations..." ?
