Re: A replacement for "implementation"

Subject: Re: A replacement for "implementation"
From: John Gilger <JohnG -at- MIKOHN -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:45:16 -0700

DCOM has these limitations:
{bullet list}

Keep It Short 'n' Sweet <G>

"current implementation" is a weasel phrase that adds no information to the
sentence. After all you are documenting the latest and greatest release of
your product (unless you are a historian). Does this product have any
"uncertain limitations"?

My $0.02 worth

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Rowena Hart [mailto:rhart -at- INTRINSYC -dot- COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 1998 9:37 AM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Q.: A replacement for "implementation"

How would you rewrite "...the current implementation of DCOM
has certain limitations..." ?

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: Re: Documenting Classes and Methods/Functions
Next by Author: Re: US professional issues
Previous by Thread: Re: Q.: A replacement for "implementation"
Next by Thread: Re: A replacement for "implementation"


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads