TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:FW: Single source ducumentation and Doc2Help From:Josee mariann Proulx <jmproulx -at- EMS -dot- NET> Date:Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:54:19 -0400
Personally, I would not suggest Doc2Help. It is not stable and tends to
corrupt files. RoboHelp does a _much_ better job in terms of time and ease
of use.
Josee Mariann Proulx
Technical Writer
Development Department
Exchange Market Systems E.M.S.
4200 St.Laurent Blvd, suite 1100
Montreal, Quebec
H2W 2R2
"Times are bad. Children no longer obey their parents, and everyone is
writing a book." -Cicero
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward Rosenberry [SMTP:wardr -at- WORLD -dot- STD -dot- COM]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 1999 1:45 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: Single source ducumentation
Look at Doc-to-Help from Wextech ( www.wextech.com ).
It produces HTML Help, Java Help, W3C HTML, Win 95 Help, Win3.1 Help,
and printed docs from one source. The templates for the printed docs
look and work ok, too.
But nothing is perfect. I've had to use this for several projects and
recall numerous struggles to get everything looking right and behaving
properly at production time.
RoboHelp from Blue Sky Software ( www.blue-sky.com ) is similar.
Ward
Graham Bridge wrote:
> Dear Everybody,
>
> I've been following this discussion group for a while and now I am
> seeking some hard advice on the above subject.
> I am the Documentation Manager in a French based multi-national company
> who is a software editor of Automated CAM and Production Control
> applications.
>
> For the moment these two products are supported by paper only
> documentation (600 pages/2 volumes for CAM and 1600 pages/9 volumes for
> Production Control). This documentation has been done with Word97 on a
> reasonably structured basis (well defined templates, macros, multiple
> files using automatically generated TOCs and indexes).
>
> We now want to (and have to) move on to On line Help, CD based
> documentation, Web based documentation - and we have to maintain the
> paper documentation.
>
> My question is, is there a 'perfect' product which will allow us to
> produce all these different document formats without giving us any great
> maintenance headaches, i.e. we update one source and this generates
> updating in the other media sources.
>
> Another point of importance is that I really do prefer that we stay with
> Word as the source of the paper document, although this is not an
> irrevocable rule - but I will be very reluctant.
>
> Very best regards,
>
> Graham Bridge
>
>
From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Rosenberry Associates Inc. "The Information Design Company"
30 Newfield Street EMAIL: wardr -at- rosenberryassoc -dot- com
N. Chelmsford, MA, 01824 (USA) TELEPHONE AND FAX: 978 251-7908
--------------------------------------------------------------------
