TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Just a quick request for information on how some of you get reviewers to
provide you with the information you need.
I've tried putting guidelines in the review cover page, having team
meetings to discuss the review process, and even talking with the reviewers
one-on-one.
Perhaps I'm not covering all the bases when I discuss this with them. Can
any of you provide me with information you use to inform reviewers on the
type of feedback you need from review?
