TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I've been running NT4 for years now and have had few problems. It's more
stable than 95 and 98. Installing hardware is a little harder because it
doesn't have plug & play. Also, it's more expensive. Haven't used it with
any of the applications you mention but it's worked great with all the
analysis tools I've loaded. Good luck
-- Meg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacque Foreman [SMTP:foremangraphics -at- juno -dot- com]
> Subject: OT? NT4 op sys - Any Probs
>
> What I need to know is any of you is running (or quit running because of
> system problems) NT4. What are the major disadvantages you have found
> using NT as your op sys?
>
> You need to know that, whatever op sys I use it must be compatible with
> PageMaker 6 & 6.5+, Quark 3.32 (Quark 4 if I get around to upgrading),
> PhotoShop 5 (&5.5), Illustrator7 (&8), Olympus 200 (old digital camera)
> software, Designer 3 (&4), Corel4.
