RE: but is thinking required also?

Subject: RE: but is thinking required also?
From: "Peter Swisher" <PeteS -at- bmgi -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:53:25 -0700


" Let me guess ... the other 20% consists of - lunch and bathroom
breaks? ;-)"

No. Groveling for your paycheck or a developer's time, or mumbling
"that's my stapler".

Job descriptions like that fall into the realm of abject ridicularity.
Kinda like writing: "click the Blue button to go to the Blue screen. The
Blue screen will display."


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: ADMIN: Don't start down this road
Next by Author: Basic Voice ??s: OK for Software to "allow", "let", "enable", "provide" and so forth?
Previous by Thread: RE: but is thinking required also?
Next by Thread: RE: but is thinking required also?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads