RE: Conferences in the early 21st Century

Subject: RE: Conferences in the early 21st Century
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
To: "'kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com'" <kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:45:54 -0400

Keith..does knowing how to use a tool mean that you know how to use every
in-depth and advanced feature of the tool?

f'instance...I like to think that I know FM pretty well...I can create large
complex documents, way more complex and controlled than anything anyone is
creating around here in Word.

However, suppose my boss comes to me and asks me to do something above and
beyond what I know and what I was expected to know...let's say something
like advanced XML using Structured FM or API development to allow
integration with database'd data.

Would this qualify as an acceptable tools training opportunity on a tool
that I already know?

John Posada
Information Hunter-Gatherer
Special Projects; Information Technology
Barnes&Noble.com
NY: 212-414-6656


---------------
I've always wondered how people talked their employers into forking out
thousands to send them to seminars about tools they're already supposed to
know how to use.

I can see being able to pitch an STC conference, or some other
multi-faceted gathering, where the employee could conceivably learn about
new solutions to bring back to the company. Or I can see subsidizing
attendance at seminars that deal with the actual TECHNOLOGY you're
documenting. But to spend that much just so you can hang out with people
who use the same word processing software? Hats off to you if you can pull
it off. I'm not saying the conferences are worthless, just amazed that
some can get their bosses to pay for them to attend.


****************************************************************************
**********************************
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be
CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE,
and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If
you are not an
intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and take the steps
necessary to
delete the message completely from your computer system.

Not Intended as a Substitute for a Writing: Notwithstanding the Uniform
Electronic Transaction
Act or any other law of similar effect, absent an express statement to the
contrary,
this e-mail message, its contents, and any attachments hereto are not
intended to represent
an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise
intended to bind
this sender, barnesandnoble.com llc, barnesandnoble.com inc. or any other
person or entity.






Previous by Author: RE: Do you voluntarily develop long-term projects on the job?
Next by Author: RE: The last minute crunch
Previous by Thread: Re: Conferences in the early 21st Century
Next by Thread: Summary of XML Classes Replies


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads